‘It’s going to be ugly’: Westminster braces for Spending Review

Laura Kuenssberg

“the NHS and the army with the rest just bolted on” There is a joke, of sorts, doing the rounds in Whitehall, that soon government will be . For ministers fighting to keep cash to spend in their departments it’s not that funny..

“the last big set of decisions” In a couple of weeks, the Chancellor Rachel Reeves will reveal what an insider described as before the next general electionIt’s an open secret in Westminster billions will be found for health and defence..

But the chancellor and her deputy, Darren Jones, are locked in conversations with Cabinet ministers about setting all government budgets all the way to 2029Forget rows over winter fuel or welfare payments, the Spending Review sets the terms for everything..

Much more than spats over spreadsheets, it’s a series of arguments about who and what the government is forWho wins and who loses will set the political terrain for years to come. I’ve talked to nearly 20 ministers, advisers, and insiders about what’s going on behind closed doors..

“It’s going to be ugly,” observes a Whitehall sourceIn case you’ve been living on Mars, ministers have said, again and again, government has to “live within its means”, and “there’ll be difficult decisions”. That’s all code for saying some bits of government spending will be hacked back..

The paradox is that overall, the government is spending more – big tax rises in the autumn meant hefty cheques for public services.

“capital spending” And the chancellor also changed the rules on how much she can borrow to spend on long term projects, what’s known as , giving her more than £100bn to dole out this time round.

“there are services in real danger” But because some kinds of spending - like health or defence - are getting significant extra cash, there’s a tight squeeze on day-to-day spending more or less everywhere elseDespite the vast budgets, one government source admits, ..

“early and swift progress” Who, or what then, are the likely winners and losers? By late Friday more than half of government departments had reached a final agreement with the TreasuryNo 10 claims evidence of ..

“genuinely trying to be collaborative” A member of the Cabinet praises Reeves and Jones for That’s not a universal view. “It’s got quite spicy,” another source says, with some acute tensions, hardly surprising given there are billions at stake, and political reputations to make or break..

“literally line by line,” There are literally thousands upon thousands of decisions, with us going one government insider saysBut there is a rough rule of thumb. With day-to-day spending, the Treasury will be tight as a drum, but relatively generous when it comes to capital spending..

So cash for new roads, power infrastructure, hospital buildings, and prison building will flowGovernment is likely to try to create headlines from those big-ticket items – the expected approval of the new Sizewell C nuclear power station is one example..

“infrastructure week” In the next few days, as if as a warm up, you’ll hear announcements about investing in new kit for health, construction jobs for housing, and water infrastructureThe Spending Review itself is likely to be followed by what sources describe as , a whole range of plans..

“the capital budget’s OK, it’s the day to day where the really difficult conversations are” One source said, And that means departments whose budgets are gobbled up by providing public services every day, like police officers, care for the vulnerable or primary schools, are likely to feel the heat..

There are multiple arguments, planted like political landmines, any of which could explode across Whitehall before the review on 11 June.

“mad” There is even a hunt for savings in Downing Street, which one source describes as , at a time when “if you are worried about delivery and grip, spend money in No 10!“There are tensions over council budgets, depleted after years while demands on them grow..

There’s uncertainty over cash to build affordable homes over the long term, and money earmarked to help deprived areas growThere is worry the budget to insulate millions of homes might be raided..

There’s concern that plans to improve police numbers and performance and halve violence against women and girls might not be allocated enough cashAnd there’s a conversation about whether capping bus fares is really value for money..

“The money is so difficult they are having big fights about small amounts,” one source saysCapping bus fares only costs about £200m - pennies when it comes to the overall government budget..

“Only one in six passengers use it - so for £200m that money could be working harder,” another source tells me, “but the politics wrapped around it mean if you touch, it is a third rail”.

Under pressure, different ministers and their teams are taking what could diplomatically be described as very different approaches.

“no” There are whispers of slammed doors, and tales of one cabinet minister refusing to take notes to meetings, and answering to every suggestion or remark made by officialsMinisters will always want more for their departments and when money is tight, it’s not surprising the process is fraught..

In conversation with some sources, you can hear worry in their voices about the effect decisions might have on the services the state provides.

“We’re already so up against it – the core problem is that money is very, very tight.” One cabinet minister told me, But another said some colleagues “are being unrealistic about where the country is fiscally”.

“there is a lot of fat and waste” Some in government even say, , suggesting some cuts, even reducing headcount among civil service that’s “grown out of control”, have been easy to findMaking the sums add up is the first part of the process..

The second question is where this all fits into an unpopular government’s storyThere is hope in senior circles that the review, together with big infrastructure plans, can be used to create a summer of good news, after many months of taking a pasting..

“stories not spreadsheets” Reeves’ deputy, Jones, wants to create and has been regularly talking to groups of MPs about what’s being lined up for their area, evidence of what government is doing they can sell to frustrated voters.

“day-to-day spending is what people notice… you don’t swing votes with long-term projects” The tricky part, as one government sources suggests is that Remember it’s day-to-day spending that’s tight, long-term cash for capital that’s likely to flow..

“There is huge pressure to have something to show for it in three-and-a-half years’ time,” the source addsYou can fill plenty of potholes before 2029. You can’t plan and build many power stations..

“it could be another political party sitting there – there needs to be an argument from a Labour Treasury, and Rachel needs to set that out” There’s an appetite in pockets of government to have a much clearer explanation of why money needs to be saved, or else, one source warns, .

And trying to save cash confronts two other realities.

“missions” With the focus squarely on health, defence, and long term projects, what happens to all of the prime minister’s – remember them? “It’s really hard to see how the missions survive,” one source says, even though those ambitions were meant to define Sir Keir Starmer’s whole approach to government.

And what about his supposed zeal for reform, rewiring the state? Enthusiasts would argue being short of cash is the best argument for making big change.

“How do you avoid political momentum dropping out of everything else, if most departments are spending the next few years managing decline? How do you maintain political momentum in a world of down arrows?” But as an experienced Whitehall insider asks, Changes that might save lots of cash, and more importantly provide better services to voters in the long term, can cost money at the start.

In the coming weeks you’ll hear government sources boast about the importance of this Spending Review and say it’s disgraceful that the Conservatives swerved doing full audits for yearsBut process isn’t always good politics..

The modern spending review was conceived by Gordon Brown in an era when he wanted to flaunt his largesseNew Labour had cash to splash, and spending reviews were big moments to show it off. In contrast, Sir Keir’s Labour confronts fragile public finances..

Treasury sources argue, with obvious logic, that it’s helpful to spell out long-term financial plans so departments and the public know what’s coming.

Yet there’s a risk the event of the Spending Review serves to highlight political division and cuts, rather than any pluses of Downing Street’s decisions.

“I don’t really understand why they are doing it all,” one insider tells me, “maybe it’s about saying, ‘Oh look, we’re governing’, but it’s just importing bad choices into No 10 and 11”.

The front pages are already featuring flashes of unhappiness, like the tussles between the Treasury and Angela Rayner, who’ll be with us in the studio tomorrow, alongside Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch.

Like many big political moments, the Spending Review presents huge possible reward, and huge possible risk, because the actual decisions being made will shape the services available to the public, and the fabric of the country for the next few yearsBut also, money talks..

The financial choices being made right now will tell the government’s political story.


📚 Related Resources & Recommended Products

📚 Related Resources & Products

🔗 Our Website: https://gnnnued.com

🛍️ Featured Products:

Featured Product: 10Ft High Speed Hdmi R To Hdmi Micro Ca

10Ft High Speed Hdmi R To Hdmi Micro Ca

Premium quality professional product with excellent features and reliable performance. Designed for both professional and personal use with industry-standard quality assurance.

Key Features:

  • Professional-grade quality and durability
  • Easy to use with excellent results
  • Suitable for both beginners and professionals
  • Backed by quality guarantee

📺 Related Videos: Subscribe to our YouTube channel for more insights 💡 Need Help?: Contact our expert team for personalized solutions 🚀 Stay Updated: Follow us for the latest industry trends and products

Remaining 0% to read
All articles, information, and images displayed on this site are uploaded by registered users (some news/media content is reprinted from network cooperation media) and are for reference only. The intellectual property rights of any content uploaded or published by users through this site belong to the users or the original copyright owners. If we have infringed your copyright, please contact us and we will rectify it within three working days.