Chinese AI startup DeepSeek’s newest AI model, an updated version of the company’s R1 reasoning model, achieves impressive scores on benchmarks for coding, math, and general knowledge, nearly surpassing OpenAI’s flagship o3. But the upgraded R1, also known as “R1-0528,” might also be less willing to answer contentious questions, in particular questions about topics the Chinese government considers to be controversial.

That’s according to testing conducted by the pseudonymous developer behind SpeechMap, a platform to compare how different models treat sensitive and controversial subjects. The developer, who goes by the username “xlr8harder” on X, claims that R1-0528 is “substantially” less permissive of contentious free speech topics than previous DeepSeek releases and is “the most censored DeepSeek model yet for criticism of the Chinese government.”

Though apparently this mention of Xianjiang does not indicate that the model is uncensored regarding criticism of China. Indeed, using my old China criticism question set we see the model is also the most censored Deepseek model yet for criticism of the Chinese government. pic.twitter.com/INXij4zhfW

— xlr8harder (@xlr8harder) May 29, 2025

As Wired explained in a piece from January, models in China are required to follow stringent information controls. A 2023 law forbids models from generating content that “damages the unity of the country and social harmony,” which could be construed as content that counters the government’s historical and political narratives. To comply, Chinese startups often censor their models by either using prompt-level filters or fine-tuning them. One study found that DeepSeek’s original R1 refuses to answer 85% of questions about subjects deemed by the Chinese government to be politically controversial.

According to xlr8harder, R1-0528 censors answers to questions about topics like the internment camps in China’s Xinjiang region, where more than a million Uyghur Muslims have been arbitrarily detained. While it sometimes criticizes aspects of Chinese government policy — in xlr8harder’s testing, it offered the Xinjiang camps as an example of human rights abuses — the model often gives the Chinese government’s official stance when asked questions directly.

TechCrunch observed this in our brief testing, as well.

DeepSeek R1 censorshipDeepSeek’s updated R1 answer when asked whether Chinese leader Xi Jinping should be removed.Image Credits: DeepSeek

China’s openly available AI models, including video-generating models such as Magi-1 and Kling, have attracted criticism in the past for censoring topics sensitive to the Chinese government, such as the Tiananmen Square massacre. In December, Clément Delangue, the CEO of AI dev platform Hugging Face, warned about the unintended consequences of Western companies building on top of well-performing, openly licensed Chinese AI.


📚 Featured Products & Recommendations

Discover our carefully selected products that complement this article’s topics:

🛍️ Featured Product 1: GREETING CARD “HAMSA HAND” #75824

GREETING CARD “HAMSA HAND” #75824 Image: Premium product showcase

Premium quality greeting card “hamsa hand” #75824 designed for professional use with excellent performance and reliability.

Key Features:

  • Professional-grade quality standards
  • Easy setup and intuitive use
  • Durable construction for long-term value
  • Excellent customer support included

🔗 View Product Details & Purchase


🛍️ Featured Product 2: GREETING CARD “HILARIOUS” #44992

GREETING CARD “HILARIOUS” #44992 Image: Premium product showcase

Advanced greeting card “hilarious” #44992 engineered for excellence with proven reliability and outstanding results.

Key Features:

  • Industry-leading performance metrics
  • Versatile application capabilities
  • Robust build quality and materials
  • Satisfaction guarantee and warranty

🔗 View Product Details & Purchase

💡 Need Help Choosing? Contact our expert team for personalized product recommendations!

Remaining 0% to read
All articles, information, and images displayed on this site are uploaded by registered users (some news/media content is reprinted from network cooperation media) and are for reference only. The intellectual property rights of any content uploaded or published by users through this site belong to the users or the original copyright owners. If we have infringed your copyright, please contact us and we will rectify it within three working days.